While a minor violation is usually negligible, a material breach often has more serious consequences. Plaintiffs can argue in court that the breach of the agreement cost them money or caused material damage to their finances. In the event of a material breach, either party may ask a lawyer to challenge the violations resulting from the violation. Legal contracts and litigation often have their own language, which can be difficult to understand for someone who is not familiar with legal terminology. The term “legal language” may be useful as an abbreviation when lawyers communicate with each other, but some terms are incomprehensible to the layman. A better case that shows the potential difference that the two materiality standards can make is Frontier Oil Corp. v. Holly Corp., No. Civ. 20502, 2005 WL 1039027 (del ch. 29 April 2005).
In Frontier Oil, Vice-Chancellor Noble found that an undisclosed indemnification agreement that held Frontier directly liable for matters that were the subject of certain “threats of litigation” was not an essential contract for the purposes of establishing a breach of a warranty made by Frontier with respect to the existence of material contracts. He did so because (using the meaning of the phrase “affects the decision” of material) the risk that liability would arise from such a threat of litigation and thus implied that the compensation at the time of the warranty was too uncertain to be “material”, although it later turned out that the actual litigation was larger and potentially more effective.  However, it is difficult to imagine that the existence of such compensation would not have been considered “material” in the sense of “significant enough to merit attention”, since the existence of the threat of litigation was identified as potentially problematic and it was presumed to be hosted in a separate subsidiary of Frontier without the existence of the indemnity agreement. In litigation, an important witness is a person whose testimony is an integral part of the proceedings. Important witnesses can and will be compelled to appear and testify in court. If there are indications that the security of the person is threatened and that he may be threatened as a result of actual testimony or a planned witness testimony, legal protection or preventive detention is granted. Most often, substantive law refers to contract law. In this context, a substantive lawyer may represent clients when they enter into a contract or claim damages for a material breach of contract. In other cases, the term “material” may refer to the meaning of the discussion of an issue. For example, an important fact is relevant to the rest of the process that must be decided before the court can proceed. A computer program is not a material object, but a literary work.  A key question is one that must be answered when two parties are in dispute and involved in litigation.
For the dispute to be resolved, the question must be answered. If an issue is material, it may be preferable to convert a liability, contract, or material dispute into a liability, contract, or dispute that involves (or may include) more than a certain amount (below which a dollar threshold for such liability, contract, or dispute would be considered insignificant). However, depending on the nature and extent of a landscape of materiality for the purposes of establishing existence or damage that may be suffered as a result of breach of representations and warranties or satisfaction of closing conditions regarding the accuracy of representations and warranties, these issues may be of less concern because all materiality qualifiers are eliminated (although materiality scratches are generally not covering compliance, “in all important respects”, with alliances as a condition of conclusion). In some legal contexts, “substantive law” refers to any law that regulates materials. These are partly defined by law as “dredged materials, solid waste, incineration residues” and so on. In this case, substantive law refers to the laws and regulations that govern the storage and disposal of materials that are normally hazardous. One of those terms that may have confused you is substantive law. Although you are familiar with criminal or civil law, substantive law means something else. In this context, the term “material” means something other than its concrete use in everyday conversation. Here`s everything you need to know about substantive law and how it can benefit you. Buried in the broader discussion of the meaning and application of the term “significant adverse effects” in the recent decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery, Channel Medsystems, Inc.
v. Boston Scientific Corp., CA No. 2018-0673-AGB, 2018 WL 4719347 (Del Ch. 18. December 2019), the meaning of “material” is when used in other contexts in a takeover agreement. As mentioned in our previous article on the Channel Medsystems decision, Chancellor Bouchard has definitively confirmed what all business professionals and their lawyers should know about the meaning of the three-word phrase “significant negative impact”: whatever that may mean in other contexts, in the context of acquisitions, This means much more than just that a significant negative impact has occurred on the acquired business. Instead, it has the importance attributed to it by the Delaware precedent, i.e. an impact that “significantly threatens the overall profit potential of the target company significantly on an ongoing basis.” Regardless of the significance, significance or consequences of the adverse event, a “significant adverse effect” exists only if this jurisprudential definition is met.  When an allegation is made, it is considered material if it forms a substantial part of the case submitted. The material suggests that this has to do with the issue. It has influence or is effective, will have merit and is more or less necessary.
The evidence presented in a case or issue is considered material if it is relevant and goes to the heart of the case in the dispute or has a legitimate influence on the decision made in the case. Ken Adams calls this meaning “material” the meaning “affects the decision.”  Something in between is simply important enough to merit attention or non-trivial and something that goes to the heart of the agreement`s value to the buyer is the obvious meaning of “material” when used as a modifier in an agreement or representation. A tangible object under the Copyright Act is the form of a fixed work such as a film, cassette or diskette for a literary work or a building or drawing for an architectural work. The word “material” is important in most legal contexts, although its meaning is slightly different from what you may experience in your daily life. In Akorn, Inc. v Fresenius Kabi AG, C.A. No. 2018-0300-JTL, 2018 WL 4719347 (Del Ch. Oct.