All Drugs Should Be Legalized Debate Pros and Cons

29/09/2022por Mentores

There is another harsh reality: in some cases, the only thing that forces someone who is addicted and gets out of control in therapy is the threat (or reality) of incarceration. Eliminate the laws that prohibit the sale of these drugs, and you eliminate the only hope of help for so many people who are addicted but simply cannot stop. “The question young adult mental health experts are asking is: What does the decriminalization of drugs mean for this age group? Will the legalization of drugs lead to an increase in drug abuse and marijuana addiction for Gen Z? Disadvantages: On the other hand, because psychoactive drugs, including marijuana, cause acute mental impairment when people use the drug, as well as addiction (about 9% of marijuana users), increased accessibility, destigmatization and reduced price associated with legalization would result in more users and therefore more dangers and potential harm to the population (for example, driving under drugs), as well as cases of addiction. The government could generate tax revenue from a legalized drug market. In June 2019, it was reported that the U.S. state of Colorado had surpassed $1 billion in government revenue from the sale of cannabis since it was legalized in 2014. The Liberal Democrats have suggested that legalising cannabis in the UK could bring in £1.5 billion a year. There could also be huge savings in money and resources if the illicit drug trade is not monitored to the same extent. “Nowhere can there be reliable and objective scientific evidence that [illegal drugs] are more harmful than other legal substances and activities.

Given the enormous effort, carnage and obvious futility of the “war on drugs” that has led to a massive criminalization of society, it is high time to examine the supposed justification for the illegality of certain substances. Those who initiated these bans, and those who are now trying so vigorously to enforce them, have not made their objectives clear. Should they protect us from evil, addiction or poison? Unless other countries do the same, the UK or other countries that decriminalise or legalise drugs could attract drug tourists. This could actually be beneficial from a purely economic point of view, but it could also be problematic behavior. Should drugs be legalized? What for? Is it time to lift the ban on recreational drugs like marijuana and cocaine? Can we stop the drug trade? If so, what would be the best way to reduce consumption? So, should drugs be legalised in the UK? There are a number of professionals who are often argued by those who say they should. It should be borne in mind that some proponents of legalization distinguish between different types of drugs. For example, there is a Lib Dems campaign to legalize drugs, but this only applies to cannabis. Siobhan Benita, the Liberal Democrat candidate for Mayor of London in 2021, is campaigning for the UK capital to become the first city in the country to have a legal and regulated cannabis market. She says it would help break the grip of criminal gangs and protect London`s young people. Even as the country moves toward a more widespread decriminalization of drugs, the legalization of drugs remains a controversial issue. For every argument about why drugs should be legal, there is one that emphasizes why drugs should not be legalized.

And there are statistics on drug legalization that support both sides of the problem. There are a number of pros and cons to legalizing drugs, and there is no simple answer. The legalization of drugs is a highly controversial issue and can generate strong opinions on both sides of the debate on drug legislation. It is undeniable that many drugs can have extremely negative effects both on the individual user and on society as a whole. Addiction can be very destructive to the physical and mental well-being of the user and lead to problematic behavior that affects others around them. This is generally accepted by both parties. Arguments for and against drug legalization tend to focus more on whether the criminalization of drug use — the “war on drugs,” as it is often called — is the most effective way to address the problem. Drug legalization in Oregon has followed in the footsteps of countries like Portugal, the Netherlands and Switzerland, which have decriminalized the possession of small amounts of hard drugs.

In 2001, Portugal became the first country in the world to decriminalize the acquisition, possession and consumption of small quantities of all illicit drugs. However, the country has not decriminalized drug trafficking, which involves larger amounts of drugs. In addition, people caught using drugs will not be detained, but could be fined, used as a non-profit organization, or referred to treatment programs. Here is the list of recreational drugs (in alphabetical order) that could be decriminalized in the future: The organization estimated that legalizing cannabis could lead to an additional million people trying the drug, resulting in the addiction of an additional 100,000 people. However, this contradicts the first item on the pro list. “Does it work illegally to make addictive drugs? Cocaine and powerful narcotics were sold freely in America until the first two decades of the 20th century, and the number of dependent patients dropped sharply once availability was limited. Those on the other side of the drug legalization debate argue that the adoption of marijuana by the general public will lead to an increase in marijuana use and thus an increase in marijuana dependence, especially since the potency of marijuana has steadily increased over the past 30 years. They also believe that marijuana is an entry drug and, therefore, an increase in marijuana use would lead to an increase in the use of harder drugs.

Opponents are also concerned about the possible increase in hospitalizations related to drug legalization, predicting an increase in fatal car accidents and traffic brakes following the legalization of recreational marijuana. As with most topics in the drug legalization debate, there is research that supports and rejects the latter thesis. If the government heavily taxed a legalized drug market, drug gangs could still function. This could include manufacturing or smuggling substances and selling to consumers at lower prices or selling stronger versions. Research confirms that marijuana use among young adults has reached all-time highs, particularly marijuana vaping rates. The annual Monitoring the Future (MTF) survey found that one in four young adults use marijuana and nearly one in 10 use marijuana daily. A survey found that Gen Z uses marijuana twice as often as the national average. But are these increases due to the decriminalization of drugs? Studies show that the legalization of drugs has increased marijuana use among adults, but not among teenagers, as many feared. Young adults include both of these age groups. “There is no place here to lay out all the arguments for and against the legalization of certain drugs, but it is clear that: drugs are easy to obtain; the drug subculture thrives in part because it is prohibited and therefore attractive; Dollar after dollar, the billions we invest in this “war” would be better spent on education, prevention and treatment. Would it not be better to control these substances, to tax them, to limit their availability to minors, as we are trying to do with alcohol, rather than to criminalise a large part of the population, which probably includes many of our neighbours and even our own children? The genie in the bottle is the truth, and the truth is that not all drugs are terrible, bad, or just as harmful. CONs: It is likely that the sale and consumption of drugs, as well as public health and safety among the population, will increase significantly as more people consume them.

Thus, potential tax revenues from sales can be offset by economic losses associated with lower labour productivity (for example, more people taking days off to recover from the effects of use), as well as health care costs.